BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//LPCN · Laboratoire de Psychologie Caen Normandie - ECPv6.16.4.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-WR-CALNAME:LPCN · Laboratoire de Psychologie Caen Normandie
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://lpcn.unicaen.fr
X-WR-CALDESC:Évènements pour LPCN · Laboratoire de Psychologie Caen Normandie
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Paris
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20250330T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20251026T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20260329T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20261025T010000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:20270328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:20271031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260630T083000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260704T180000
DTSTAMP:20260624T095922Z
CREATED:20260624T095921Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260624T095922Z
UID:90308-1782808200-1783188000@lpcn.unicaen.fr
SUMMARY:European Association of Social Psychology General Meeting 2026
DESCRIPTION:Le congrès triennal de l’European Association of Social Psychology (EASP) se tiendra à Strasbourg du 30 juin au 4 juillet 2026\, en partenariat avec l’ADRIPS. Plusieurs membres du LPCN interviendront lors de cet évènement. \n\n\n\n\n\nL’European Association of Social Psychology (EASP)\n\n\n\nL’EASP est la principale association scientifique européenne dédiée à la psychologie sociale. Elle rassemble une communauté internationale de chercheurs et chercheuses afin de promouvoir l’excellence scientifique\, soutenir la collaboration internationale et favoriser la diffusion des connaissances dans des domaines tels que les relations intergroupes\, les attitudes\, l’identité sociale ou l’influence sociale. À travers ses congrès\, ses réseaux de recherche et ses publications académiques\, l’EASP contribue au développement et au rayonnement de la psychologie sociale au niveau international. L’édition 2026 de son congrès se déroulera à Strasbourg du 30 juin au 4 juillet 2026. L’EASP General Meeting 2026 rassemblera la communauté internationale de la psychologie sociale autour des avancées théoriques\, méthodologiques et appliquées de la discipline. Le programme met en lumière plusieurs enjeux contemporains majeurs\, tels que les dynamiques intergroupes\, l’action collective\, les questions de diversité et d’inclusion\, les transformations sociotechniques liées à l’intelligence artificielle\, ainsi que les défis sociétaux émergents auxquels la psychologie sociale contribue à répondre. \n\n\n\n\nProgramme et Inscriptions\n\n\n\n\nDes membres du LPCN seront présents\n\n\n\n\nCécile Sénémeaud est directrice du LPCN et professeure de psychologie sociale à l’université de Caen Normandie. Elle coordonne le programme de recherche PROECO. Ses travaux de recherche portent sur la compréhension et l’accompagnement du changement\, dans le domaine du développement durable\, de la transition écologique et de la santé publique. Elle est aus­si membre du GIEC nor­mand. \n\n\n\n\n\nCamille Langlais est docteure en psychologie et IGR au LPCN. Elle a soutenu sa thèse en psychologie intitulée : « Vite\, ça chauffe : faut-il réduire la distance psychologique au changement climatique pour favoriser les écogestes ? » en mai 2025 au LPCN\, sous la direction de Cécile Sénémeaud (PR\, LPCN) et de Christophe Démarque (MC\, ALLSH\, Aix Marseille Université). Elle est aujourd’hui IGR sur le projet DiPsy-Tri.Elles interviendront lors du symposium « Time-based interventions to shape environmental risk responses: insights from different theoretical and methodological perspectives » le 4 juillet\, de 8h45 à 10h25 en salle Leicester. \n\n\n\n\nDécouvrir leur présentation : Meta-analyses of the effects of psychological distance to climate change: Focusing on temporal distance and its effect on climate action\nPsychological distance (PD) to climate change has emerged as an insightful framework for explaining climate inaction\, integrating temporal\, spatial\, social\, and hypothetical factors previously studied separately (see Milfont\, 2010). However\, both correlational and experimental studies have yielded inconsistent findings across these four dimensions (e.g.\, Jones et al.\, 2017; Spence et al.\, 2012). We conducted two meta-analyses of correlational and experimental evidence (provisionally accepted as a Registered Report: https://osf.io/v8953) to assess the average effect of PD on climate action and identify between-study moderators. Findings from 41 correlational studies (82 effect sizes\, Ntotal = 36\,305) confirmed that greater PD was associated with lower climate action (r = -.24). A deeper analysis suggested that this relationship was weaker when the spatial dimension was assessed in the PD measures (r = -.23)\, and stronger when the temporal dimension was evaluated (r = -.33). In contrast\, results from 40 experimental studies (84 effect sizes\, Ntotal = 57\,855) suggested that manipulating the temporal dimension was not sufficient to foster climate action: a small but significant effect (r = .07) emerged only when all four dimensions were manipulated simultaneously.The discussion will address whether temporal distance plays a distinct role in shaping climate action and will propose practical\, time-focused\, implications for promoting climate engagement. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Camille Langlais\, Université de Caen Normandie\, LPCN UR7452 \n\n\n\nAuthors : Maxime Mauduy\, Cécile Sénémeaud\, Christophe Demarque\, Camille Langlais\, Adam Chesterman \n\n\n\n\nCécile Sénémeaud (PU\, LPCN) a également contribué à une présentation qui se déroulera lors du symposium « Beyond the Self: Examining The Social Dimensions of the Induced-Hypocrisy Paradigm » le 1 juillet\, de 11h50 à 13h10 en salle Madrid 1. \n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : When the Need for Affiliation Mediates the Influence of Social Norms in the Induced-Hypocrisy Paradigm\nThe induced-hypocrisy paradigm combines two steps – promoting a social norm and recalling past transgressions – leading individuals to adopt more norm-consistent behavior (Priolo et al.\, 2019). While this effect has long been explained by a self-threat mechanism\, a social-norm deviation approach has emerged. Strengthening (vs. weakening) the norm increases (vs. reduces) the hypocrisy effect (Mauduy et al.\, 2025). The present research examined whether this occurs because hypocrisy threatens the need for affiliation – the motivation to maintain strong social bonds.Three preregistered experiments tested this mediation hypothesis following the experimental approach. Study 1 (N = 100\, https://osf.io/dwyqp) compared control\, standard\, and strong-norm hypocrisy conditions on direct and indirect measures of affiliation need. Study 2 (N = 60\, https://osf.io/dwyqp) manipulated affiliation threat intensity (control\, low\, high) via the Cyberball paradigm and assessed prosocial behavior. Study 3 (N = 150\, https://osf.io/7gbdq) tested whether recalling a situation of past social acceptance blocked the hypocrisy effect. Results supported that hypocrisy threatens affiliation (OR = 6.37\, 95% CI [2.23\, 18.21])\, that this threat increases prosocial behavior (OR = 9.09\, 95% CI [3.10\, 33.12])\, and that satisfying the need for affiliation neutralizes the hypocrisy effect (OR = 1.50\, 95% CI [1.05\, 2.17]). Implications are discussed regarding the underlying processes and scope of the paradigm. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Maxime Mauduy\, LPS\, Université Paris Cité. \n\n\n\nAuthors : Daniel Priolo\, Maxime Mauduy\, Cécile Sénémeaud\, Nicolas Margas \n\n\n\n\nOn remarque également la contribution de Jessica Mange (MC HDR\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) et Maëlle Fleury (docteure en psychologie\, ATER\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) sur la présentation affichée de Pauline Rasset (MC\, LP3C\, Université Rennes 2)\, présentée lors de la session poster 2\, le 1er juillet\, de 16h10 à 17h10 en Galerie Schweitzer. \n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : 25. So much more than that: Manipulations of multiple categories to prevent the dehumanization of people with alcohol use disorder\nMultiple categorization (MC) refers to describing individuals through several social categories. This approach has shown promise in improving social judgments and reducing dehumanization. Yet\, the factors that enhance its effectiveness remain unclear. To address the dehumanization of people with alcohol use disorder (AUD)\, this research examined how different configurations of categories shape MC’s impact\, by manipulating their number (Study 1\, N = 266) then their valence (Study 2\, N = 265). Findings from Study 1 indicate that the benefits of MC emerges when three categories – including the stigmatizing one – are manipulated. These benefits are further enhanced with a total of five categories\, beyond which no additional improvement occurs. Results from Study 2 show that even negatively valenced categories can foster more favorable social perceptions of people with AUD\, while neutral – and especially positive – categories further amplify this effect. These findings highlight the potential of multiple categorization to humanize individuals with AUD and reduce stigma. They also show that the configuration and characteristics of the selected categories can modulate its effectiveness. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Pauline Rasset\, Université Rennes 2 – LP3C\, Associate professor \n\n\n\nAuthors :Jessica Mange\, Maëlle Fleury\, Nicolas Cabé\, Loy Sery \n\n\n\n\n\nYoann Durand est doctorant au LPCN\, il réalise son projet de thèse en psychologie sous la co-direction de Cécile Sénémaud (PU\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) et Alexandre Heeren (PU\, FNRS\, STAR lab\, Université catholique de Louvain\, Belgique). Il réalisera une présentation affichée\,  présentée lors de la session poster 5\, le 3 juillet\, de 16h10 à 17h10 en Galerie Schweitzer. \n\n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : 37. Enhancing perceived ability to control anxiety and fears in order to prevent vasovagal reactions in first-time donors\nVasovagal reactions (VVRs) during blood donation are a public health issue. Although fear and anxiety are recognized as major risk factors for these reactions\, they are rarely targeted by interventions. We hypothesized that perceived control\, or confidence in one’s ability to control the collection process and one’s own reactions\, influences the emergence of these negative emotions. This experimental study\, conducted in an ecological setting\, therefore tested whether enhancing this feeling reduced their occurrence and thus that of VVRs. \n\n\n\nTo this end\, in a randomized two-arm trial\, 546 first- and second-time donors were assigned either to the usual procedure (control) or to an intervention combining Bandura’s four sources of self-efficacy via (i) reading an experimental brochure (reduction of emotional states) and (ii) muscle tension exercises performed both by the participant (enactive experience) and by a research assistant (vicarious experience) who gave them positive feedback (verbal persuasion). \n\n\n\nThe structural equation model indicates total mediation of the intervention’s effect on anxiety and partial mediation of the intervention’s effect on fear. It also indicates that higher levels of anxiety and fear are associated with more VVRs and a lower intention to return. These results show that the intervention operates by increasing perceived control\, which identifies a simple intervention target for improving the donor experience. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Yoann Durand\, LPCN\, Université Caen Normandie\, PhD student in social psychology \n\n\n\nAuthors : Maxime Mauduy (LPS\, Université Paris Cité)\,  Romain Veillé (LAPCOS\, Université Côte d’Azur)\, Nathalie Callé (Établissement français du sang)\, Cécile Sénémeaud (Université de Caen Normandie\, LPCN UR7452). \n\n\n\n\n\nLysio Jean-Charles est doctorant au LPCN\, a débuté un projet de thèse en psychologie sous la co-direction de Cécile Sénémeaud (PR\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) et de Oulmann Zerhouni (PR\, CRFDP\, Université de Rouen). Il réalisera une présentation affichée\,  présentée lors de la session poster 7\, le 4 juillet\, de 16h10 à 17h10 en Galerie Schweitzer. \n\n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : 23. Bridging the green gap: from self-control to attribution of self-control to others\nIn the face of increasingly severe effects of climate change\, public awareness is widespread\, yet individual action remains insufficient. In order to better understand and diminish the classic intention-behavior gap\, scholars have recently explored the role of self-control – the tendency to forgo proximal temptations in favor of distal goals (Fujita et al.\, 2024) – in the realization of pro-environmental behaviors (Colombo et al.\, 2023). While essential\, this approach lacks the adoption of a broader perspective and ignores a well-documented obstacle: the belief that others are not doing their part (Lamb\, 2020). According to this logic\, individuals would adapt their efforts in the fight against climate change based on their expectations regarding the efforts made by others. Hence\, we put forward the hypothesis that the attribution of self-control to others – the personal belief about others’ capacity to refrain from indulging in immediate temptations – moderates the effect of an individual’s self-control on pro-environmental behaviors. The aim of this poster is to demonstrate the potential role of attribution of self-control to others\, which has yet to be studied in regard to the environmental psychology literature\, and to highlight the promising levers it allows for encouraging a sustainable collective action. To that end\, we will review recent theoretical models of self-control\, highlighting both their relevance and limitations when converted to the interpersonal level. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Lysio Jean-Charles\, Université de Caen Normandie\, LPCN UR7452 \n\n\n\nAuthors : Cécile Sénémeaud (Université de Caen Normandie\, LPCN UR7452)\, Oulmann Zerhouni (Université de Rouen Normandie\, CRFDP UR7475)\, Camille Langlais (Université de Caen Normandie\, LPCN UR7452) \n\n\n\n\n\nMaëlle Fleury est docteure en psychologie et ATER au LPCN. Elle a soutenu sa thèse en psychologie intitulée : « Freins et leviers des Stratégies de Protection Comportementales en population étudiante : des stratégies d’auto-contrôle à mobiliser sans modération pour prévenir les consommations d’alcool à risque »  en juin 2026\, au LPCN\, sous la direction de Jessica Mange (MC HDR\, LPCN) et co-encadrée par Maxime Mauduy (MC\, LPS\, Paris cité). Elle proposera une présentation affichée\, qui sera révélée lors de la session poster 7\, le 4 juillet\, de 16h10 à 17h10 en Galerie Schweitzer. \n\n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : 72. The use of Protective Behavioral Strategies in alcohol consumption: a question of perceived efficacy or social value attribution?\nProtective Behavioral Strategies (PBS) aim to reduce alcohol consumption and its negative consequences. Although globally effective\, their application in prevention remains limited\, partly due to a lack of understanding of their determinants. Previous research found that the most effective PBS (against risky consumption) are not the most used by students (a. inhibiting risky consumption and b. planning limits on drinking). This research therefore aims to investigate\, through self-control theories\, whether a lower perception of efficacy and/or a lower attribution of values (social\, identity\, tangible) to the most effective PBS could explain their lower use. The study (N=297) measured sociodemographic variables\, PBS use\, perceived efficacy and the subjective values attributed to PBS. Repeated-measures ANOVA (F(3\,897)=66.86; p<.001; η2p=0.183) indicated that students attributed lower values to the two least-used PBS despite their greater protection. No significant result was found about efficacy perception.Using all four PBS is the most protective\, the challenge being encouraging students to adopt the two least used (yet most effective) strategies. This goal may be achieved by targeting subjective values\, as promoting value attribution – particularly social values\, which are the least endorsed – could foster their adoption. Enhancing social values (e.g.\, linked to reputation and norms conformity) may be especially important for encouraging the use of the most protective PBS. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Maëlle Fleury\, Laboratoire de Psychologie Caen Normandie (LPCN\, EA 7452)\, Caen\, France \n\n\n\nAuthors : Maxime Mauduy\, Jessica Mange \n\n\n\n\n\nMaëva Garcia prépare une thèse en psychologie intitulée « En quête du social dans l’approche bio-psycho-sociale : « social cure » et prévention de la rechute addictive »\, sous la co-direction de Jessica Mange (MC HDR\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) et Nicolas Cabé (MC-PH\, CHU\, Université de Caen Normandie). Elle réalisera une présentation affichée\,  présentée lors de la session poster 5\, le 3 juillet\, de 16h10 à 17h10 en Galerie Schweitzer. \n\n\n\n\nDécouvrir la présentation : 73. Exploring the paradoxical role of multiple identities and social support in university students’ risky health behaviors: What we learned from alcohol\nEmerging drinking patterns among university students\, such as binge drinking (BD; 6+/7+ drinks for women/men consumed in 2 hours)\, call for renewed approaches to preventing risky health behaviors. While the “social cure” effect of social support (SSU) and multiple identities (MI) on health has been well documented\, MI may also function as a “social curse” in highly socialized drinking patterns such as BD. 551 students completed a questionnaire measuring demographic\, psychological\, and alcohol use variables (alcohol use disorder (AUD) and BD practice). After controlling for anxiety and depression symptoms\, a mediation model revealed two key effects: 1) Social cure effect of SSU: MI were positively associated with both given (? = .06*) and received (? = .13***) SSU\, but only given support was negatively associated with AUD (? = -.55**) and BD (? = -3.13**). 2) Social curse effect of MI: MI were directly and positively associated with AUD (?= .49***). These findings underline the dual role of MI and SSU in university students’ AUD and BD. Potential justifications\, such as social norms\, will be discussed. However\, their causal interpretation remains limited by the cross-sectional nature of the data. Future studies should test the temporal dynamics of a mediation model and extend it to other socially embedded risky health behaviors\, such as tobacco use and video gaming\, to further explore the scope of the social cure model beyond AUD and BD. \n\n\n\nSpeaker : Maëva Garcia\, Université de Normandie\, Laboratoire de Psychologie Caen Normandie \n\n\n\nAuthors :J essica Mange\, Thomas Ledoux\, Catherine Grenier
URL:https://lpcn.unicaen.fr/evenement/european-association-of-social-psychology-general-meeting-2026/
LOCATION:Palais de la Musique et des Congrès\, 1 Avenue Schutzenberger\, strasbourg\, 67000\, France
CATEGORIES:Communications,Congrès - Colloque
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lpcn.unicaen.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2026/06/easp2026.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260630T140000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Paris:20260630T173000
DTSTAMP:20260603T093742Z
CREATED:20260603T093739Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20260603T093742Z
UID:90248-1782828000-1782840600@lpcn.unicaen.fr
SUMMARY:Soutenance d’Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches de Céline Lanoë
DESCRIPTION:Céline Lanoë (MC\, LPCN\, Université de Caen Normandie) soutiendra son Habilitation à Diriger des Recherches (HDR) le mardi 30 juin à 14h dans l’amphithéâtre de la MRSH (Maison de la Recherche en Sciences Humaines) situé sur le Campus 1 de l’Université de Caen.  \n\n\n\nElle s’intitule : Fonctions exécutives\, métacognition et apprentissages scolaires : conception\, implémentation et évaluation de programmes pédagogiques pour une éducation inclusive. \n\n\n\nLa composition du jury est la suivante : \n\n\n\n\nSéverine Casalis\, PU\, Université de Lille\, Rapportrice\n\n\n\nJérôme Clerc\, PU\, Université de Grenoble\, INSPE\, Examinateur\n\n\n\nCaroline Giraudeau\, PU\, Université de Tours\, Rapportrice\n\n\n\nFranck Ramus\, DR\, ENS PSL Paris\, Rapporteur\n\n\n\nSandrine Rossi\, PU\, Université de Caen Normandie\, INSPE\, Garante et examinatrice\n\n\n\nYoussef Tazouti\, PU\, Université de Nancy\, INSPE\, Examinateur\n\n\n\n\n\n\nL’accueil du public se fera à partir de 13h30\, la soutenance sera suivie d’un cocktail dans la cafétéria de la MRSH. \n\n\n\n\n\nVous pourrez assister à la soutenance en visioconférence si vous ne pouvez pas vous déplacer\, le lien vous sera envoyer sur simple demande à l’adresse émail : lpcn@unicaen.fr  \n\n\n\n\nCéline Lanoë est Maîtresse de Conférences en Psychologie du Développement à l’Université de Caen Normandie. Son expertise porte sur les liens entre le contrôle cognitif\, le langage et les apprentissages scolaires dans le domaine de l’éducation. Au LPCN elles est impliqué dans le programme de recherche SCOPE – Les Sciences COgnitives Pour l’Éducation.
URL:https://lpcn.unicaen.fr/evenement/soutenance-dhabilitation-a-diriger-des-recherches-de-celine-lanoe/
LOCATION:Caen · Campus 1 · Maison de la recherche en sciences humaines (MRSH) · Amphi\, Campus 1\, Maison de la recherche en sciences humaines (MRSH)\, 1 Esplanade de la Paix\, Caen\, 14000\, France
CATEGORIES:Soutenance
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://lpcn.unicaen.fr/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2026/06/picjumbo_com-child-865116_1280.jpg
ORGANIZER;CN="Laboratoire en psychologie Caen Normandie (LPCN)":MAILTO:lpcn@unicaen.fr
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR